Nano-Micro Letters

A Review: Enhanced Anodes of Li/Na-Ion Batteries Based on Yolk-Shell Structured Nanomaterials

View ResearcherID and ORCID

Cuo Wu1, Xin Tong1, Yuanfei Ai1,  De-Sheng Liu1, Peng Yu1, Jiang Wu1, 2, Zhiming M. Wang1, *

Abstract
icon-htmlFull Text Html
icon-pdf-smPDF w/ Links
icon-citExport Citation
Figures
+Show more

Nano-Micro Lett. (2018) 10: 40

First Online: 17 January 2018 (Review)

DOI:10.1007/s40820-018-0194-4

*Corresponding author. E-mail: xusy@pku.edu.cn; lmpeng@pku.edu.cn

 

Abstract

 


Fig. 1 Graphics illustration of yolk-shell structure: a single shell with single yolk, b double shells with a single yolk, c multiple shells with a single yolk, and d single shell with multiple yolks. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [21, 55, 133]. TEM images of: e single shell with single yolk, f double shells with single yolk, and g single shell with multiple yolks. h SEM, i TEM, j HRTEM and k element mapping images of triple shells with single yolk. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [58, 60, 62, 68]

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and sodium ion batteries (SIBs) have received much attention in energy storage system. In particular, among the great efforts on enhancing the performance of LIBs and SIBs, yolk-shell (YS) structured materials have emerged as a promising strategy towards improving lithium and sodium storage. YS structures possess unique interior void space, large surface area and short diffusion distance, which can solve the problems of volume expansion and aggregation of anode materials, thus enhancing the performance of LIBs and SIBs. In this review, we present a brief overview of recent advances in the novel YS structures of spheres, polyhedrons and rods with controllable morphology and compositions. Enhanced electrochemical performance of LIBs and SIBs based on these novel YS structured-anode materials were discussed in detail.


 

Keywords

Yolk-shell structure; Lithium-ion batteries; Sodium-ion batteries

 

Full Text Html

1 Introduction 

    Fossil fuels maintain the backbone for global energy supply. With the fast growth of energy consumption, it is urgent to exploit renewable energy [1]. Until now, solar and wind energy burst out a capability of relieving energy shortage [2]. Diverse energy conversion and storage devices are developed towards efficiently exerting solar and wind energy [3-7]. In this respect of energy storage from solar and wind energy to electrical energy, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) account for a significant status due to its large capacity, long lifespan and high energy density [8-9]. Furthermore, LIBs play a key role in the development of portable electronic devices and electric vehicles (e.g., laptops and cell phones) [10-13]. Generally, the configuration of LIBs consists of an anode, a cathode and electrolyte. During the process of charging and discharging, Li ions intercalate and deintercalate between two electrodes via the electrolyte [14]. The composition, morphology and structure of cathodes and anodes, together with the diffusion kinetics in the electrolyte are significant and have been widely studied to thoroughly exert these superior properties in LIBs [8, 15-16]. Particularly, the performance of LIBs significiantly depends on the active anodes, which are used to store and release Li ions during charging and discharging possess [17-18]. The most worldwide popular anode is graphite anode on account of its stable potential, low cost and long cycle life since its commercialization in LIBs by Sony Corporation [19-20]. However, the graphite anode has a limited theoretical specific capacity of 372 mAh g–1 and poor rate capacity, which cannot satisfy the development of the portable electronic devices and electric vehicles [21-23]. Additionally, the global storage of lithium cannot afford massive application [24-25].Nevertheless, sodium enormously exists on earth [26-27]. Therefore, sodium ion batteries (SIBs) with working principle identical to LIBs, is expected to be an alternative strategy for decreasing the cost of LIBs, even though the energy density of SIB is tentatively inferior to LIBs [25, 28-29].

    In order to boost the capacity of LIBs and SIBs, a number of novel structures have been studied [30-31]. Recently, one kind of hollow structures [32-34], yolk-shell (YS) structures, have drawn much attention in applications of drug deliver [35], sensor [36], catalyst [37], LIBs and SIBs [38-39]. Different from core/shell structure in dense contact [40], a typical spherical YS structure resembles frogspawn structure with a void interior, which provides movable space for core which can be aslo called yolk, as shown in Fig. 1a. Upon used as LIBs and SIBs anodes, YS structured materials are distinctive to improve electrochemical performance due to many advantages including unique buffering space, large surface area and short diffusion distance [41-44]. The void space of YS structured materials can address the problems of subversive volume expansion and avoid aggregation of electroactive cores during charging/discharging process. YS structured materials were first synthesized through silica template by Hyeon et al. [45]. Initial researches of YS structures concentrated on spherical structures [46-48]. Afterwards, with the development of different synthetic methods such as selective etching [49], self-template [50], Ostwald ripening [51-52] and Kirkendall effect [46, 53], YS structures can be prepared into manifold types [54-56].

Fig. 1 Graphics illustration of yolk-shell structure: a single shell with single yolk, b double shells with a single yolk, c multiple shells with a single yolk, and d single shell with multiple yolks. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [21, 55, 133]. TEM images of: e single shell with single yolk, f double shells with single yolk, and g single shell with multiple yolks. h SEM, i TEM, j HRTEM and k element mapping images of triple shells with single yolk. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [58, 60, 62, 68]

Fig. 1 Graphics illustration of yolk-shell structure: a single shell with single yolk, b double shells with a single yolk, c multiple shells with a single yolk, and d single shell with multiple yolks. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [21, 55, 133]. TEM images of: e single shell with single yolk, f double shells with single yolk, and g single shell with multiple yolks. h SEM, i TEM, j HRTEM and k element mapping images of triple shells with single yolk. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [58, 60, 62, 68]

    In this review article, we mainly emphasized the recent developments of YS structured anodes and their application for enhanced electrochemical performance in LIBs and SIBs. Following the introduction, in the second part, we provided a brief overview of typical and recent novel YS structures categorized into spheres, polyhedrons and rods. In the third and fourth part, we discussed these YS structure-designed materials towards the enhanced electrochemical performance in LIBs and SIBs, respectively. Subsequently, a summary was concluded in the final part.

2 Development of Yolk-Shell Structures

2.1 Sphere Structure

    A typical spherical YS structure has a smooth spherical surface for both its shell and core. Generally, spherical YS structures vary in both shells and yolks, such as single shell with single yolk [57], double shell with single yolk [58-59], multiple shell with single yolk [60-61] and multiple yolks with single shell [62], which are shown in Figs. 1a-d. For a better understanding of these structures, we would review these structures based on different fabrication approaches. The YS structure can be fabricated not only from inside to outside but also outside to inside [49, 63-67]. As shown in Fig. 1e, the single shell with single core MoS@C was synthesized by an etching strategy [68]. MoS2@PDA core-shell microspheres were transferred to single-shelled  YS MoS2@C by annealing. Afterwards, instead of calcination [69], the environmentally friendly H2O2 was used as an etching solution and tuned the void space with different concentrations between the MoS2 yolk and the carbon shell. However, using calcination method can synthesize complex structure. As depicted in Fig. 1f, the double-shelled YS SnO2@SnO2@SnO2 were fabricated through carbon calcination of three times. Carbon worked as hard template in designing this YS structure [70]. Polymerizing and carbonizing sucrose inside SnO2 particles generated the precursor of C-SnO2 composites. Due to lacking oxygen inside the dense core, the oxidation of carbon happens on the outside. The first combustion generated the C-SnO2/SnO2 core-shell. While under 1000 °C, the distinguishable thermal expansion coefficient of SnO2 and C-SnO2 resulted in the first void space. After another two times combustion and contraction, one yolk with double shells structure was generated [58]. Using similar method, Leng et al. [60] accurately controlled the generation of triple-shelled NiCo2O4 spheres while polyvinylpyrrolidone served as a template. Figure 1h, i proves that the as-prepared multi-shell spheres had uniform sizes. Ni, Co, and O elements were detected and evenly distributed in dot-mapping images of Fig. 1k. The four red dashed cycles in Fig. 1j show the morphology of three shells and one yolk. Apart from a single yolk, multiple yolks with a single shell Sn4P3@C were fabricated from outside single carbon shell to inside multi-yolks. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (Fig. 1g) shows the chief yolk abounded with tiny yolks [62].

Fig. 2 Schematic demonstration of novel YS structure of: a polystyrene spheres (PS)@NiCo2S4, Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. b urchin-like Bi2S3@polypyrrole(ppy), Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. c rough VO2 microspheres, Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73] and d pomegranate-like Si@C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. The corresponding TEM images of e PS@NiCo2S4, and f Bi2S3@ppy. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [71, 72]. g1 FESEM and g2 TEM images of VO2 microspheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. h SEM image of pomegranate-like Si@C particles. Inset shows the spherical morphology in overall. i Details of sub-YS nanospheres in a single pomegranate-like Si@C particle. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]

Fig. 2 Schematic demonstration of novel YS structure of: a polystyrene spheres (PS)@NiCo2S4, Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. b urchin-like Bi2S3@polypyrrole(ppy), Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. c rough VO2 microspheres, Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73] and d pomegranate-like Si@C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. The corresponding TEM images of e PS@NiCo2S4, and f Bi2S3@ppy. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [71, 72]. g1 FESEM and g2 TEM images of VO2 microspheres. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. h SEM image of pomegranate-like Si@C particles. Inset shows the spherical morphology in overall. i Details of sub-YS nanospheres in a single pomegranate-like Si@C particle. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]

    Recently, a number of novel YS spheres have emerged. Different with conventional YS spheres with smooth shell and yolk, the shell or the yolk of the novel YS spheres possess various surfaces. The coconut-like polystyrene(PS)@NiCo2S4 YS sphere (shown in Fig. 2a) was synthesized from inside to outside by Zhu et al. [71]. Silicon dioxide was used for template and then removed during the hydrothermal process. Figure 2e exhibits numerous nanosheets around the shell which endow ultrahigh surface area exceeding 200 m2 g-1 and penetrable property of this YS structure. In addition to changing shell morphology, the yolk can also be transformed. Liang and co-workers [72] were inspired by cirsium flower and assembled Bi2S3 nanowires to fabricate a yolk of radial pattern which was coated by polypyrrole (PPy). On account of the whippy PPy, the designed architecture possesses mechanical flexibility, short diffusion distance and large surface area. In Fig. 2f, we can see that the flexible shells are expanded by inside radial Bi2S3 nanowires. Furthermore, Ma and co-workers [73] tried to synthesize rough shell and rough yolk spheres (Fig. 2c) from outside to inside through a template-free method. In this template free method based on Ostwald-ripening mechanism [74], dissolution and recrystallization formed the VO2 YS spheres. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Fig. 2g1 and TEM image in Fig. 2g2 clearly demonstrate the rough and high surface area and the rough yolk inside. In addition to independent single YS sphere, Cui and co-workers developed a single main sphere consisting of many sub-YS spheres. Figure 2d shows multiple sub-YS architectures of Si@C that is inspired by pomegranate [75]. In the fabrication process, silicon dioxide was etched to engender void space.

2.2 Polyhedron Structure

    The sphere is not the only YS architectures. YS polyhedron has also drawn much attention due to its tailored shape with more surfaces in energy conversion [76-79]. YS Polyhedron can be categorized in pentahedron [80], hexahedron [81], octahedron [82] and dodecahedron [83]. Fe3O4@C YS nanobox of hexahedron were successfully synthesized by Liu et al. [84]. Polydopamine(PDA) wrapped the Fe2O3 nanocubes which had the size of 530 nm. After calcination, Fe2O3@PDA became Fe3O4@C and engendered interior void space between yolk and shell due to Ostwald-ripening effect. The void space expanded after etching. Figure 3a illustrates the schematic transformation of the Fe3O4 yolk with different etching reaction time by hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution. Figure 3b1-b2 are TEM images of Fe3O4@C YS nanobox after 1, 2 and 3 h etching, respectively. The thickness of the carbon shell was 20 nm. With increasing time, the Fe3O4 yolk decreased from initial 530 nm to 470, 380, and 230 nm. Using similar method, He and co-workers [85] also fabricated the sulfured Fe3O4@C YS nanobox via the extra melt-diffusion process. Meanwhile, Liu and co-workers [86] sulfured Fe3O4@C to FeS2@C with sulfur powder through combustion. Besides, Su and co-workers [81] utilized metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) to drive the generation of CdS microboxes basing on the anion exchange and Kirkendall effect process. Excepting for tuning yolk size through etching, the thickness of shell can be controlled. Varying the PDA concentration is used to successfully synthesize different carbon shells with sizes of 15, 25, and 35 nm in Sn@C nanoboxes by Zhang et al. [87]. Unlike nanobox with uniform six surfaces, FeOx@C YS hexahedron with two rhombus and other unequal surfaces was proposed by Yu et al. [78]. Interestingly, a prism structure of Ni-Co precursor was contracted to Ni-Co oxide YS nanoprisim (as depicted in Fig. 3c) via thermal treatment in air [80]. Heterogeneous contraction happened from vertical and lateral directions in the prism structure. Figure 3f demonstrates the prism-like shell and yolk. During the contraction, two competitive forces of contraction force and adhesive force coexisted. Ni-Co precursor core inward contracting was caused by the contraction force. On the contrary, the adhesive force outward expanded the core due to carbon dioxide releasing from organic decomposition. Based on hydrothermal reaction, the octahedral structure of Fe2PO5/polymer serving as precursor and template was synthesized via one-step method. After calcination, dense octahedral structure transformed into hollow octahedral graphitized carbon (GC) shell with Fe2P yolk, as shown in Fig. 3d. SEM image of Fig. 3g1 and TEM image of Fig. 3g2 demonstrate the YS octahedral structure. Another Au@Cu7S4 YS octahedral structure with nanorod yolk is shown in Fig. 3e [88]. The nanorods can be clearly found in Fig. 3f.

Fig. 3 a Schematic illustration YS Fe3O4@C nanobox following 1-, 2-, and 3-h etching time. The TEM images (b1 , b2, b3) of Fe3O4@C nanobox are showed in the dashed box corresponding to 1-, 2-, and 3-h etching, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. Graphic illustrations of c YS nanoprism of Ni-Co mixed oxide, d YS octahedral Fe2P@C, and e YS octahedral Au nanorod@Cu7S4. f TEM image of YS Ni-Co mixed oxide nanoprism. g1 SEM image and g2 TEM octahedral Fe2P@C. h TEM octahedral Cu7S4 shell with Au nanorod yolk. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [80, 82, 88]

Fig. 3 a Schematic illustration YS Fe3O4@C nanobox following 1-, 2-, and 3-h etching time. The TEM images (b1 , b2, b3) of Fe3O4@C nanobox are showed in the dashed box corresponding to 1-, 2-, and 3-h etching, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. Graphic illustrations of c YS nanoprism of Ni-Co mixed oxide, d YS octahedral Fe2P@C, and e YS octahedral Au nanorod@Cu7S4. f TEM image of YS Ni-Co mixed oxide nanoprism. g1 SEM image and g2 TEM octahedral Fe2P@C. h TEM octahedral Cu7S4 shell with Au nanorod yolk. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [80, 82, 88]

2.3 One- and Three-Dimensional Structures

    Additionally, one dimension (1D) YS rods can offer wider lateral void space and shorter ion diffusion length. Combining nanorod yolk in YS structure, rod-like YS structures with rod shell are also studied [89-91]. Li and co-workers [92] prepared an Au@TiO2 YS nanorod structure. By using decyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), absorption preference of high energy crystal planes on gold seeds generated the Au core nanorod structure. As can be seen in Fig. 4a1-d1, the gold seeds further grew along {111} planes which are not wrapped by CTAB. With diverse Au nanorod aspect ratios, SiO2 can work as a template to form hollow space, as shown in Fig. 4a2, b2, c2, d2. TiO2 was easily broken down during calcination. In order to fabricate stable TiO2 shell, as depicted in Fig. 4a3, b3, c3, d3, the SiO2 shell was secondly coated as protective shell, as shown in Fig. 4a4, b4, c4, d4. SiO2 packing agent is tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and TiO2 packing agent is tetrabutyl titanate (TBOT). After calcination and etching, the YS rod-shell and rod-yolk structure was formed, which are depicted in Fig. 4a5, b5, c5, d5. Different with above rod in rod YS structure, Zhang et al. [93] demonstrated a Fe3O4@Fe3C@C YS structure of nanorod (nanospindle) shell with spherical yolk. The nanospindle carbon shell with thickness of 3-5 nm was formed via using α-Fe2O3 nanospindle as precursor coated with resorcinol formaldehyde (RF). After carbonization, the core-shell Fe3O4@Fe3C acting as the yolk possessed a size of 15-20 nm. The interior void space largely occupied 75% of total inside volume. Xu et al. [94] designed a tree branch YS structure. Multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWNT) served as trunk to support the rod-branches of YS Fe2O3@C. Coating the template of SiO2 was for interior hollow space generation in etching step. Another self-templated Sn@SnOx YS nanosphere structure arrayed in nanofiber was proposed by Kang et al. for the first time [64]. The carbon nanofiber with Sn nanospheres was produced by electrospinning. The Sn nanospheres densely arrayed along the C nanofiber. During calcination, C nanofiber was decomposed. Besides, the Sn nanospheres were oxidized to form SnOx shell and contracted to form Sn yolk due to Kirkendall diffusion effect.

Fig. 4 a1- a5 Schematic illustration of synthesis process of YS Au@TiO2 nanorod. The corresponding TEM images of synthesis process: b-d the as-prepared Au@TiO2 nanorod with different aspect ratios. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]

Fig. 4 a1- a5 Schematic illustration of synthesis process of YS Au@TiO2 nanorod. The corresponding TEM images of synthesis process: b-d the as-prepared Au@TiO2 nanorod with different aspect ratios. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]

2.4  Advanced Effects in the Structures

    Hollow structures is indeed a strategy to facilitate electrochemical performace of LIBs and SIBs attributing to the void cavity and thin shell. However, volume energy density is decreased along with the formation of hollow structures. YS structures possessing a suitable void space between yolk and shell can accomodate the volume expansion of yolk to maintain a sufficient volume energy density. The expansion ratio of yolk depends on the intrinsic properties of yolk materials. The well-defined void space can accommodate lithium/sodium [95]. In contrast, the extra void space will decrease the volume energy density. Additionally, a large contact area between yolk and shell promotes electron and ion diffusion [96]. Therefore, engineering the void space and large contact area is a key factor to tune the eletrochemical performance. The three types of YS structures mentioned above have different effects on void space and contact area. The final morphologies of sphere, polyhedron and rod YS structures mostly originate from initial shapes of yolks. The precursors are previously fabricated in forms of spherical shape, cubic shape, octahedral shape, and rod shape. Compared to typical YS spheres, the yolks in polyhedron shell have a larger contact area, which can facilitate conducting electrons and diffusing ions [87]. However, the polyhedron shells suffer from a larger tension on the surface. The yolks in the rod structures can expand along the length direction which have a very large void space size. Hence, the rod structures can be used for yolk materials with a large expanison ratio. Novel strategies like multiple yolks and densely stacking nanostructures cannot be scalably used. It is still noteworthy to exploring controllable and stable YS nanostructures.

3 Performance of Yolk-Shell Materials in Lithium Batteries

    The YS structure with unique buffering space, large surface area and short diffusion distance show great superiority as next-generation LIBs anodes [97-99]. Silicon is one of the promising materials for LIBs anodes [100-103]. Cui el al. [104] fabricated a YS Si@C spherical structure at room temperature. The Si assembled LIB performed a high capacity of 2,800 mAh g–1 at 0.1 C. After 1000 cycles, it still held 74% capacity retention and 99.84% Coulumbic efficiency. During the charging and discharging processes, the void space allowed the electroactive yolk to expand freely and avoided the yolks aggregating with other yolks. Figure 5l illustrates the expanded state of the YS structure after intercalating Li-ions. The carbon shell worked as a framework to support the entire structure and avoid cracking. The hollow carbon shell initially have nanopores. After several cycles, solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) is formed on the surface of the carbon shell to seperate the electrolyte and Si yolk. Another YS pomegranate-like Si@C obtained a capacity of 2,350 mAh g–1 at 0.05 C was also proposed by Cui and co-workers [75]. Its volume capacity of 1,270 mAh cm–3 was twice higher than graphite anode. The capacity retention remained 97% during the second 1000th cycle at 0.5 C. This densely packed structure resulted in a larger contact area of electrode-electrolyte and formatioin of a thin and stable SEI film, which led to high Coulombic efficiency of 99.87%. Its high Coulombic efficiency indicated the well reversible cycles of the electrode. Moreover, insufficient void space in sub-particles of this pomegranate microparticle resulted in cracks, which made SEI excessively form. Therefore, internal void sapce should be critically controlled. Similarly, Han et al. [105] coated Fe3O4 sub-nanoparticles with the pomegranate-like carbon shell, which resulted in an excellent specific capacity of 1,246 mAh g–1 at 0.8 A g–1 and extremely impeded the decrease of volume energy density. Intergrating design is an attractive strategy for LIBs. Liu et al. [106] achieved a silicon@silica@void@carbon YS nanosphere structure and interlinked these nanospheres through chemical bonding with carboxymethyl cellulose and citric acid polymer binder, which performed a high specific capacity of 1,640 mAh g–1 at 1 A g–1 and excellent stability that maintained 1000 mAh g–1 at 5 A g–1 after 1000 cycles. Except that silicon suffers the problem of volume expansion, SnO2 with a high theoretical capacity of 790 mAh g–1 similarly faced this problem [107]. Wang et al. [107] synthesized SnO2@C YS nanosphere with thin carbon shell of 15-25 nm and tailored the large interior hollow space of 100-160 nm. This SnO2@C showed the high capacity of 2,190 mAh g–1 in the first cycle. Also, Choi el al. [108] synthesized a YS double-shell SnS spheres which can deliver a specific capacity of 672 mAh g–1 for 150 cycles at 1 A g–1. The Coulombic efficiency was stably maintained  at 99% in the posterior cycles.  Fan and co-workers [109] coated ZnO yolk with carbon shell. The resultant YS ZnO@C performed an ultra-stable cyclic performance of 5,000 cycles at a current density of 10 A g–1 and kept 96.9% retention rate. Unlike popular carbon shell [110-112], Pan et al. [113] synthesized a ZnO/NiO shell composed of plentiful nanorods to encapsulate yolk materials. The composed nanorods on shell can promote electrolyte penetrating and the ZnO/NiO YS spheres performed a high specific capacity of 1008.6 mAh g–1.  Li et al. [114] synthesized YS composites of Al yolk wrapped by the thin TiO2 shell with a thickness of 3 nm. TiO2 cannot compete with Al on specific capacity. The thick TiO2 is adverse to electron and ions transport. According to the model calculation, TiO2 should be as thin as 10 nm or less. Generally, a thin shell cannot take too much internal tension. Fortunately, nanosized TiO2 was thinned to a few nanometers while had sufficient mechanical strength. This Al@TiO2 YS nanosphere possessed a high rate of 1,200 and 650 mAh g–1 at 1 C and 10 C, respectively, after the same 500 cycles and realized a robust 99.2 % Coulombic efficiency at 1 C. Kim et al. [115] filled structurally stable nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon in YS FeOx sphere. It showed the excellent capacity performance of 1,071 mAh g–1 for 1000 cycles and high rate capacity of 598 mAh g–1 at 10 A g–1. The as-prepared YS metal oxide microsphere was further connected to the yolk and shell with porous nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon (NGC). The NGC not only possessed high electric conductivity but also provided structurally supporting, which offseted the volume energy density caused by void space. Spray Pyrolysis is a highly scalable method for producing electrode materials, which can fabricate plenty of specific structured materials such as alloys, oxides, nitrides and organic-inorganic composites [116-119]. Choi and coworkers [120] used spray pyrolysis method to generate a YS structured with 7-10 components. During 100 cycles at 1 Ah g–1, 7, 8, 9, and 10 components performed 735, 647, 712, and 543 mAh g–1, respectively. Among these four specimens, 8 components increased to 1,015 mAh g–1 from 300 to 1000 cycles and sustained a Coulombic efficiency of 99.8% during cycle.

Fig. 5 TEM images and electrochemical performance of LIB assembled with YS structure anode: a Sn@C nanocube, the corresponding b cyclic voltammetry curves and c cyclic performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. d Ni2P wrapped by graphene networks, the corresponding e rate performance at different current densities, and f long-term cycle performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [124]. g urchin-like Bi2S3@ppy, the corresponding h galvanostatic profiles and i long-term cyclic performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. j Fe3O4@Fe3C nanospindle and k the corresponding long-term cyclic performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [93]. l Schematic illustration of volume expansion of YS structure yolk after lithiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]

Fig. 5 TEM images and electrochemical performance of LIB assembled with YS structure anode: a Sn@C nanocube, the corresponding b cyclic voltammetry curves and c cyclic performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. d Ni2P wrapped by graphene networks, the corresponding e rate performance at different current densities, and f long-term cycle performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [124]. g urchin-like Bi2S3@ppy, the corresponding h galvanostatic profiles and i long-term cyclic performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. j Fe3O4@Fe3C nanospindle and k the corresponding long-term cyclic performance. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [93]. l Schematic illustration of volume expansion of YS structure yolk after lithiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]

   As mentioned above, the typical spherical YS structure is not the only strategy of designed YS structure for enhancing electrochemical performance of LIBs. Zhang and co-workers [87] realized a YS Sn@C nanobox with adjustable shells of 15-35 nm to tune the void space. As exhibited in Fig. 5a, the Sn spherical yolk closely pasting on the nanobox C shell provided void space and large contact between yolk and shell. The melting point of Sn is as low as 232 ℃. Thermal calcination leads to liquid state Sn in the box-shape shell. After cooling, the liquid state Sn turned to the solid state which naturally contacted the inner surface of cubic carbon shell. The natural contact provided higher transport pathway of electrons and ions due to larger contact area. The adequate void space can satisfy the volume expansion. The Coulombic efficiency only reached 61% caused by the initial formation of SEI. While in the back cycles, the Coulombic efficiency was obtained at 98%-100%. Figure 5b shows the form of LixSn alloy in cyclic voltage peak. Figure 5c demonstrates the optimized shell of 25 nm performing, resulting in a stable capacity of 810 mAh g–1, even after 500 cycles. In addition to Sn@C, octahedral YS CuO@C with multiple yolks was designed by Tao el al., which exhibited the performance of 512 mAh g–1 at 500 mA g–1 after 300 cycles. Compared to single yolk, the multiple yolks have more contact area which can accelerate electron and ion diffusion [121]. Yu et al. [122-123] put forward a three-dimension (3D) YS structure of Ni2P nanoparticles wrapped by porous graphene networks, since graphene possesses high conductivity, as shown in Fig. 5d [124]. The porous graphene possessed high surface area. The Ni2P nanoparticles were fromed by anealing reaction of NiNH4PO4⋅H2O nanorods. The NiNH4PO4⋅H2O nanorod served as a self-assemble template for encapsulation of graphene and engendering void space. Remarkably, this 3D Ni2P@graphene (Ni2P@pG) structure showed excellent rate performance under different current density (Fig. 5e). Moreover, even at a large current density of 0.3 A g–1, its capacity possessed 457 mAh g–1 during 500 cycles of a long-term test in Fig. 5f. Its Coulombic efficiency was obtained at 99%. Mo and co-workers also used 3D graphene to realize a complex YS structure [125].They deposited N-doped graphene on Ni foam firstly. The GeO2@Ni were loaded on 3D N-doped graphene afterward. Then the 3D N-doped graphene was deposited again. After reduction and etching, the 3D Ge quantum dot@N-doped graphene YS nanostructure was formed. This YS architecture not only rapidly conducted ions and electrons through high pathway porous graphene foam, but also preserved necessary tiny void space on distributed Ge quantum dots, which extremely relieved the decrease of volume energy density. The final as-prepared YS nanostructure performed 1220 mAh g–1 for 1000 cycles and ultrahigh rate capacity of 800 mAh g–1 at 40 C. Transforming the yolk shape can also give rise to large surface area and short diffusion distance [126-127]. Liang and co-workers [72] designed an urchin-like Bi2S3 yolk assembled from nanowires. Figure 5g shows flexible shell film and urchin-like yolk. Compared to typical single spherical yolk, the urchin-like yolk has more surface area and contact sites linking to shell, which can gurantee high ions transort. Meanwhile, the branches of urchin yolk guarantee the volume expansion in the limited void space. Depicted in Fig. 5h, the initial charging and discharging capacities were 824 and 621 mAh g–1, respectively. Besides, the YS structure with urchin-like yolk had a stable performance (Coulombic efficiency of 95% over 500 cycles in Fig. 5i) at a high rate of 2 C. After the long-term cycle, it insisted a relatively high capacity of 450 mAh g–1. As mentioned before, the YS Fe3O4@Fe3C-C nanospindle with ultra-large void space of 75% volume ratio can buffer larger volume expansion [93]. This nanospindle showed a great reversible capacity of 1,128.3 mAh g–1 and kept 1120.2 mAh g–1 for 100 cycles at 500 mA g–1. Figure 5j, k show the electrochemical performance of YS nanospindle-based LIB.

4 Performance of Yolk-Shell Materials in Sodium Batteries

    YS structured anodes not only can enhance LIBs performance, but also can improve sodium storage. Considering the abundant storage of sodium, SIBs also have great potential in practical applications [128]. It is significant to explore the ways to enhance the performance of SIBs [129]. In a relevant work, by synthesized YS Sn4P3@C nanospheres, Yu`s group solved the problem of huge volume expansion of sodium alloy that would damage the anode of SIB [62]. As shown in Fig. 1g, the Sn4P3@C nanospheres had multiple yolks. The multiple yolks have advantage of large contact areas than single yolk to conduct electrons and ions. The Sn4P3@C anode integrated SIB exhibited a high capacity of 790 mAh g–1 and robust cyclic performance of 400 cycles at 1.5 C wtih high Coulombic efficiency. Li et al. [111] connected single YS Sn@C nanospheres through an eggette-like carbon membrane structure. As SIB anode, it could hinder nanospheres aggregation and provide fast pathways for Na+ transportation, which resulted in a capacity of 400 mAh g–1 at 0.1 C. The membrane carbon shell restrained the aggregation of Sn nanoparticles and connected all the YS Sn@C nanoparticles through itself to generate highway of ions and electrons. TiO2 definitely limits the storage of Na due to its confined conductivity of electrons and diffusion of ions. Even though the TiO2 as SIB anode material showed relatively low capacity, Zhang et al. [130] hence took YS nanospheres into account for enhancing TiO2 storage ability of sodium. They synthesized the N-doped and carbon tuning YS TiO2 via Ostwald ripening effect. The designed YS nanostruture with the large amount of nanosheets on its shell increased the inserted sites of Na ions due to large surface area. Therefore, these nanosheets provided a shortcut for ions diffusion. Moreover, the N-doped carbon decreased the band gap for fast movement of Na ions towards TiO2. Because of these synergetic effects, it showed a specific capacity of 242.7 mAh g–1 at 0.5 C. With current density increased to 1 C, it maintained 200.7 mAh g–1 during 550 cycles and almost 99.8% Coulombic efficiency. Moreover, its excellent performance of capacity retention kept at 95.5% for 3,000 cycles in harsh condition of 25 C. Afterwards, Qiu el al. [131] implemented a more severe test on YS TiO2@C. It obtained a capacity of 210 mAh g–1 with the stable Coulombic efficiency at 99.5% and stuck to 80% retention capacity of 2,000 cycles at 40 C. Sb is an alternative yolk material for SIB. Liu et al. [132] use Sb as yolk and carbon as shell to obtained a specific capacity of 280 mAh g–1 at 1 A g–1. Given a highspeed diffusion pathway along c-axis MoS2, Geng and co-workers [133] synthesized MoS2 shell outside Co9S8 yolk as SIB anode. The Co9S8@MoS2 spheres showed a notable cyclic performance of 300 mAh g–1 for 1,200 cycles at 2 A g–1.

Fig. 6 a TEM image and b HRTEM image of FeS2@C with 45-minute etching. Element mapping images of: c FeS2@C-0 and d FeS2@C-45. e Comparison of rate performance of FeS2@C-0 and FeS2@C-45 at various current densities. f Variation of capacity retention of FeS2@C-0 and FeS2@C-45 in 100 cycles performance at 100 mA g-1. g Long-term cyclic performance of FeS2@C-0 and FeS2@C-45. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]

Fig. 6 a TEM image and b HRTEM image of FeS2@C with 45-minute etching. Element mapping images of: c FeS2@C-0 and d FeS2@C-45. e Comparison of rate performance of FeS2@C-0 and FeS2@C-45 at various current densities. f Variation of capacity retention of FeS2@C-0 and FeS2@C-45 in 100 cycles performance at 100 mA g-1. g Long-term cyclic performance of FeS2@C-0 and FeS2@C-45. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]

    FeS2 with a theoretical capacity of 894 mAh g–1 drew Liu and co-workers` attention [86]. They synthesized a YS structure of nanobox. Figures 6a, b demonstrate the TEM and HRTEM images of FeS2@C nanobox with 45-min etching, which clearly shows the nanobox shape with a yolk. The element mapping images of FeS2@C nanobox without etching (FeS2@C-0) and with 45-min etching (FeS2@C-45) are shown in Figs. 6c, d. The element mapping images proved that Fe, S, and C were homogeneously distributed in the YS nanobox. Particularly, Figs. 6e-g compared the two FeS2@C-0 and FeS2@C-45 anodes. The FeS2@C-45 revealed the more stable variation of specific capacity than FeS2@C-0 at different current densities during long cyclic test. After 100 cycles, the FeS2@C-45 performed a capacity of 511 mAh g–1 at 100 mA g–1. After further 800 cycles, the FeS2@C-45 still obtained 330 mAh g–1 at 2 A g–1 with around full Coulombic efficiency. Another YS Sn3P4@C nanobox structure was generated by Ma el al. [134]. They fabricated ZnSn(OH)x nanoboxe firstly and used it as a template then to generate Sn3P4@C nanobox. As SIB anode, the YS Sn3P4@C nanobox relieved Sn3P4 yolk expansion and showed the remarkable cyclic performance of 516 mAh g–1 at 1 A g–1 for 500 cycles with the Coulombic efficiency of 99.0%. Additionally, YS Sb@Ti-O-P nanorods were synthesized for SIB anode to reach a high capacity of 760 mAh g–1 at 500 mA g–1 after 200 cycles [90]. Another novel YS dodecahedron structure of Co3O4@C for SIB anode showed a capacity of 307 and 269 mAh g–1 at 1,000 and 2,000 mA g–1, respectively [77].

    As a result of the enhanced performance of YS materials applied in LIBs and SIBs, it can mainly attribute to the functional YS shell. Due to the hollow shell, the yolk can be relatively increased weight fraction to increase energy density compared to the dense yolk-shell structure. More than that, the hollow shell provides void space to buffer yolk expansion and avoid aggregation of yolks. The shell is thin enough and has a large surface area which can highly lower diffusion distance. The spherical YS type is superior in low specific area which can conduce to reducing surface tension. The void size in typical spherical spheres can be further filled with porous NGC to facilitate electrons diffusion and decreased volume energy density. The densely stacked spherical nanoparticles can efficiently relieve the decrease of volume energy density [135]. However, the spherical spheres can`t have enough contact area between yolk and shell for electrons conducting and ions diffusing. The polyhedron can provide more surface for yolk contacting instead. In additon, the rod YS structures possess high aspect ratio. This structure can be used for large expanison ratio-based yolk materials. Carbon is mostly used as shell materials. However, the amorphous carbon shell with large sites can trap lithium, which will resulted in decreasing Coulombic efficiency. Si based anode have large capacity, while using porous Si as yolk material will partially release the stress of volume expansion [136-138]. Overall, the electrochemical performance of the YS structured anodes has been effectively improved in LIBs and SIBs.

5 Conculsion and Perspectives

    The YS structures in LIBs and SIBs are reviewed in this paper. Typical spherical YS structures are tuned with various numbers of shells and yolks varying in number and size. To explore more spherical YS structures, the rough shells were formed with large surface area. The yolks are changed in self-assembled nanowires. Also, sub-YS nanospheres were gathered to form a pomegranate-like nanosphere. Interestingly, a box-shape shell with box yolk YS structure is synthesized via Ostwald-ripening effect. Other than box-in-box structure, prism and octahedron shells with nanoparticle and nanorod and rod-shape YS structures are also discussed. The YS structured materials with tailored interior space, shape and components can synergetically relieve volume expansion and facilitate rapid diffusion and electron transportation. Due to these superior merits, the YS structured anodes immensely improved Li and Na storage performance, which resulted in high specific capacity, excellent rate capability and stable long-term cyclic performance. These YS structured materials indeed showed promising performance as LIBs and SIBs anodes. Partial results are concluded in Table 1.

Table 1 Electrochemical performance of YS structured materials

10 3 40 table1

    In order to more precisely control the shape and size, futher study should be focused on exploring accessible and advanced approaches. Rigid materials such as silicon and silica usually act as sacrificial layers to engineer the internal void space between the yolk and shell. However, the dissolution solvents, like hydrofluoric acid that can etch the sacrificial layers, are harmful. The environmentally friendly etching solutions should be explored.  The densely stacked nanoparticles provide a strategy to sustain the volume energy density. The advanced methods which can stack polyhedron/rod YS structures and increase contact areas are significant in the future developments. In addtion, morphology control would not be confined to these three types. It also appears a trend to explore two-dimensional YS nanosheets. The alternative materials with even lower cost should be explored for scalable and commerical usage. Carbon is still the most popular yolk-shell materials with good electric conductivity. Future works should concentrate on designing the void space size according to the expansion fraction of yolk materials. Na ion is bigger than Li ion, which results in a larger volume expansion in the YS structure. It`s also necessary to find materials with a small expansion ratio of Na ions and high theoretical specific capacity. Undoubtedly, novel YS structures with tailored and functional components are crucially promising to enhance LIBs and SIBs performance in the near future with commercially available and industrially scalable application.

Acknowledgements

    The work is supported by National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) No. 2013CB933301, National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 51272038 and 61474015.

References

[1] X. Su, Q. Wu, J. Li, X. Xiao, A. Lott, W. Lu, B.W. Sheldon, J. Wu, Silicon-based nanomaterials for lithium-ion batteries: a review. Adv. Energy Mater. 4(1), 1300882 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201300882
[2] X. Meng, X.Q. Yang, Sun X, Emerging applications of atomic layer deposition for lithium-ion battery studies. Adv. Mater. 24(27), 3589-3615 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200397
[3] J.S. Chen, X.W. Lou, SnO2-based nanomaterials: synthesis and application in lithium-ion batteries. Small 9(11), 1877-1893 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201202601
[4] W.D. He, L.H. Ye, K.C. Wen, Y.C. Liang, W.Q. Lv, G.L. Zhu, K.H.L. Zhang, Materials research advances towards high-capacity battery/fuel cell devices. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 14(1), 12-20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.511031
[5] X. Tong, Ferroelectric properties and application of hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 15(4): 326-332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.7090905
[6] X. Tong, X.T. Kong, Y. Zhou, F. Navarro-Pardo, G.S. Selopal et al., Near-infrared, heavy metal-free colloidal “giant” core/shell quantum dots. Adv. Energy Mater. 8(2), 1701432 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201701432
[7] Q. Fan, Q. Lan, M. Zhang, X. Fan, Z. Zhou, C. Zhang, Preparation and photocatalytic activities of 3D flower-like CuO nanostructures. J. Semicond. 37(8), 19-27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083002
[8] B. Luo, L. Zhi, Design and construction of three dimensional graphene-based composites for lithium ion battery applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 8(2), 456-477 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE02578D
[9] Y. Tang, Y. Zhang, W. Li, B. Ma, X. Chen, Rational material design for ultrafast rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44(17), 5926-5940 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00442F
[10] Y. Sun, N. Liu, Y. Cui, Promises and challenges of nanomaterials for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16071 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.71
[11] L. Lu, X. Han, J. Li, J. Hua, M. Ouyang, A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 226, 272-288 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060
[12] K. Fu, Z. Wang, C. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Yao et al., All-component transient lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6(10), 1502496 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502496
[13] Y. Hou, M. Qiu, T. Zhang, J. Ma, S. Liu, X. Zhuang, C. Yuan, X. Feng, Efficient electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting by a 3d nanostructured carbon supported on flexible exfoliated graphene foil. Adv. Mater. 29(3), 1604480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604480
[14] S.P. Ong, V.L. Chevrier, G. Hautier, A. Jain, C. Moore, S. Kim, X. Ma, G. Ceder, Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(9), 3680-3688 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE01782A
[15] G. Li, Y. Li, J. Chen, P. Zhao, D. Li, Y. Dong, L. Zhang, Synthesis and research of egg shell-yolk NiO/C porous composites as lithium-ion battery anode material. Electrochim. Acta 245, 941-948 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.039
[16] Y. Liang, Y. Jing, S. Gheytani, K.-Y. Lee, P. Liu, A. Facchetti, Y. Yao, Universal quinone electrodes for long cycle life aqueous rechargeable batteries. Nat. Mater. 16(8), 841-848 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4919
[17] M.T. McDowell, S.W. Lee, W.D. Nix, Y. Cui, 25th Anniversary Article: Understanding the Lithiation of Silicon and Other Alloying Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 25(36), 4966-4985 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301795
[18] W. Liu, P. Oh, X. Liu, M.-J. Lee, W. Cho, S. Chae, Y. Kim, J. Cho, Nickel-rich layered lithium transition-metal oxide for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(15), 4440-4457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409262
[19] P. Roy, S.K. Srivastava, Nanostructured anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(6), 2454-2484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA04980B
[20] L. Ji, Z. Lin, M. Alcoutlabi, X. Zhang, Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(8), 2682-2699 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00699H
[21] Z. Li, H.B. Wu, X.W. Lou, Rational designs and engineering of hollow micro-/nanostructures as sulfur hosts for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 9(10), 3061-3070 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE02364A
[22] M. Zhang, E. Liu, T. Cao, H. Wang, C. Shi et al., Sandwiched graphene inserted with graphene-encapsulated yolk-shell g-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for efficient lithium ion storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(15), 7035-7042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA01239J
[23] R. Luo, W. Lv, K. Wen, W. He, Overview of graphene as anode in lithium-ion batteries. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 0, 1-12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.6032519
[24] Z. Li, J. Ding, D. Mitlin, Tin and tin compounds for sodium ion battery anodes: phase transformations and performance. Acc. Chem. Res. 48(6), 1657-1665 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00114
[25] M.-S. Balogun, Y. Luo, W. Qiu, P. Liu, Y. Tong, A review of carbon materials and their composites with alloy metals for sodium ion battery anodes. Carbon 98, 162-178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.091
[26] X. Xiang, K. Zhang, J. Chen, Recent advances and prospects of cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 27(36), 5343-5364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501527
[27] H. Kim, H. Kim, Z. Ding, M.H. Lee, K. Lim, G. Yoon, K. Kang, Recent progress in electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6(19), 1600943 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600943
[28] L.P. Wang, L. Yu, X. Wang, M. Srinivasan, Z.J. Xu, Recent developments in electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(18), 9353-9378 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06467D
[29] S.-W. Kim, D.-H. Seo, X. Ma, G. Ceder, K. Kang, Electrode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries: potential alternatives to current lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2(7), 710-721 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201200026
[30] X. Zuo, J. Zhu, P. Müller-Buschbaum, Y.-J. Cheng, Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: A chronicle perspective review. Nano Energy 31, 113-143 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.013
[31] Y. Zhao, L.P. Wang, M.T. Sougrati, Z. Feng, Y. Leconte, A. Fisher, M. Srinivasan, Z. Xu, A review on design strategies for carbon based metal oxides and sulfides nanocomposites for high performance Li and Na ion battery anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 7(9), 1601424 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601424
[32] L. Shen, L. Yu, X.-Y. Yu, X. Zhang, X.W. Lou, Self-templated formation of uniform NiCo2O4 hollow spheres with complex interior structures for lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(6), 1868-1872 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409776
[33] J. Xie, L. Liu, J. Xia, Y. Zhang, M. Li, Y. Ouyang, S. Nie, X. Wang, Template-free synthesis of Sb2S3 hollow microspheres as anode materials for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 10(1), 12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-017-0165-1
[34] X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, B. Luo, H. Zhu, W. Chu, K. Huang, Microwave-assisted synthesis of NiCo2O4 double-shelled hollow spheres for high-performance sodium ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 10(1), 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-017-0164-2
[35] H. Chen, B. Qi, T. Moore, F. Wang, D.C. Colvin et al., Multifunctional yolk-in-shell nanoparticles for ph-triggered drug release and imaging. Small 10(16), 3364-3370 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201303769
[36] X. Li, X. Zhou, H. Guo, C. Wang, J. Liu, P. Sun, F. Liu, G. Lu, Design of Au@ZnO yolk–shell nanospheres with enhanced gas sensing properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(21), 18661-18667 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am5057322
[37] Z.-M. Cui, Z. Chen, C.-Y. Cao, L. Jiang, W.-G. Song, A yolk-shell structured Fe2O3@mesoporous SiO2 nanoreactor for enhanced activity as a Fenton catalyst in total oxidation of dyes. Chem. Commun. 49(23), 2332-2334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC38649J
[38] Y.N. Ko, Y.C. Kang, S.B. Park, A new strategy for synthesizing yolk-shell V2O5 powders with low melting temperature for high performance Li-ion batteries. Nanoscale 5(19), 8899-8903 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR02625F
[39] Y.N. Ko, S.H. Choi, S.B. Park, Y.C. Kang, Hierarchical MoSe2 yolk-shell microspheres with superior Na-ion storage properties. Nanoscale 6(18), 10511-10515 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR02538E
[40] P. Hou, H. Zhang, Z. Zi, L. Zhang, X. Xu, Core-shell and concentration-gradient cathodes prepared via co-precipitation reaction for advanced lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(9), 4254-4279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA10297B
[41] S.H. Choi, Y.C. Kang, Ultrafast synthesis of yolk-shell and cubic NiO nanopowders and application in lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(4), 2312-2316 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am404232x
[42] Z. Li, M. Li, Z. Bian, Y. Kathiraser, S. Kawi, Design of highly stable and selective core/yolk–shell nanocatalysts—A review. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 188, 324-341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.067
[43] L. Yu, H. Hu, H.B. Wu, X.W. Lou, Complex hollow nanostructures: Synthesis and energy-related applications. Adv. Mater. 29(15), 1604563 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604563
[44] F. Xie, L. Zhang, D. Su, M. Jaroniec, S.-Z. Qiao, Na2Ti3O7@N-doped carbon hollow spheres for sodium-ion batteries with excellent rate performance. Adv. Mater. 29(24), 1700989 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700989
[45] M. Kim, K. Sohn, H.B. Na, T. Hyeon, Synthesis of nanorattles composed of gold nanoparticles encapsulated in mesoporous carbon and polymer shells. Nano Lett. 2(12), 1383-1387 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl025820j
[46] J. Gao, G. Liang, B. Zhang, Y. Kuang, X. Zhang, B. Xu, FePt@CoS2 yolk−shell nanocrystals as a potent agent to kill hela cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(5), 1428-1433 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja067785e
[47] J.S. Chen, C.M. Li, W.W. Zhou, Q.Y. Yan, L.A. Archer, X.W. Lou, One-pot formation of SnO2 hollow nanospheres and α-Fe2O3@SnO2 nanorattles with large void space and their lithium storage properties. Nanoscale 1(2), 280-285 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/B9NR00102F
[48] Y. Chen, H. Chen, L. Guo, Q. He, F. Chen, J. Zhou, J. Feng, J. Shi, Hollow/rattle-type mesoporous nanostructures by a structural difference-based selective etching strategy. ACS Nano 4(1), 529-539 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901398j
[49] W. Wei, Y. Zhao, S. Peng, H. Zhang, Y. Bian, H. Li, H. Li, Yolk–shell nanoarchitectures with a Ru-containing core and a radially oriented mesoporous silica shell: facile synthesis and application for one-pot biomass conversion by combining with enzyme. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(23), 20851-20859 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am5052608
[50] X.-J. Wu, D. Xu, Soft template synthesis of yolk/silica shell particles. Adv. Mater. 22(13), 1516-1520 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200903879
[51] H. Wang, H. Lin, Y. Long, B. Ni, T. He, S. Zhang, H. Zhu, X. Wang, Titanocene dichloride (Cp2TiCl2) as a precursor for template-free fabrication of hollow TiO2 nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nanoscale 9(5), 2074-2081 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR09730H
[52] C.C. Yec, H.C. Zeng, Synthesis of complex nanomaterials via Ostwald ripening. J. Mater. Chem. A 2(14), 4843-4851 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA14203E
[53] B. Zhao, X. Guo, W. Zhao, J. Deng, B. Fan, G. Shao, Z. Bai, R. Zhang, Facile synthesis of yolk–shell Ni@void@SnO2(Ni3Sn2) ternary composites via galvanic replacement/Kirkendall effect and their enhanced microwave absorption properties. Nano Res. 10(1), 331-343 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1295-3
[54] R. Purbia, S. Paria, Yolk/shell nanoparticles: classifications, synthesis, properties, and applications. Nanoscale 7(47), 19789-19873 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR04729C
[55] J. Liu, S.Z. Qiao, J.S. Chen, X.W. Lou, X. Xing, G.Q. Lu, Yolk/shell nanoparticles: new platforms for nanoreactors, drug delivery and lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 47(47), 12578-12591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC13658E
[56] Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, L. Ding, Y. Wang, J. Xu, One-pot method for multifunctional yolk structured nanocomposites with N-doped carbon shell using polydopamine as precursor. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11(1), 212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1425-6
[57] J. Li, J. Wang, D. Wexler, D. Shi, J. Liang, H. Liu, S. Xiong, Y. Qian, Simple synthesis of yolk-shelled ZnCo2O4 microspheres towards enhancing the electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries in conjunction with a sodium carboxymethyl cellulose binder. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(48), 15292-15299 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA13787B
[58] Y.J. Hong, M.Y. Son, Y.C. Kang, One-pot facile synthesis of double-shelled sno2 yolk-shell-structured powders by continuous process as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 25(16), 2279-2283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201204506
[59] J. Li, J. Wang, X. Liang, Z. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Qian, S. Xiong, Hollow MnCo2O4 submicrospheres with multilevel interiors: from mesoporous spheres to yolk-in-double-shell structures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(1), 24-30 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am404841t
[60] J. Leng, Z. Wang, X. Li, H. Guo, H. Li, K. Shih, G. Yan, J. Wang, Accurate construction of a hierarchical nickel-cobalt oxide multishell yolk-shell structure with large and ultrafast lithium storage capability. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(29), 14996-15001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA02956J
[61] M.Y. Son, Y.J. Hong, Y.C. Kang, Superior electrochemical properties of Co3O4 yolk-shell powders with a filled core and multishells prepared by a one-pot spray pyrolysis. Chem. Commun. 49(50), 5678-5680 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC42117A
[62] J. Liu, P. Kopold, C. Wu, P.A. van Aken, J. Maier, Y. Yu, Uniform yolk-shell Sn4P3@C nanospheres as high-capacity and cycle-stable anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8(12), 3531-3538 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE02074C
[63] A. Guiet, C. Göbel, K. Klingan, M. Lublow, T. Reier et al., Hydrophobic nanoreactor soft-templating: a supramolecular approach to yolk@shell materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(39), 6228-6240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201502388
[64] J.S. Cho, Y.C. Kang, Nanofibers comprising yolk–shell Sn@void@SnO/SnO2 and hollow SnO/SnO2 and SnO2 nanospheres via the kirkendall diffusion effect and their electrochemical properties. Small 11(36), 4673-4681 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201500940
[65] L. Cao, D. Chen, R.A. Caruso, Surface-metastable phase-initiated seeding and ostwald ripening: A facile fluorine-free process towards spherical fluffy core/shell, yolk/shell, and hollow anatase nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(42), 10986-10991 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201305819
[66] C. Dai, A. Zhang, J. Li, K. Hou, M. Liu, C. Song, X. Guo, Synthesis of yolk-shell HPW@Hollow silicalite-1 for esterification reaction. Chem. Commun. 50(37), 4846-4848 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC00693C
[67] B.Y. Guan, A. Kushima, L. Yu, S. Li, J. Li, X.W. Lou, Coordination polymers derived general synthesis of multishelled mixed metal-oxide particles for hybrid supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 29(17), 1605902 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605902
[68] Y. Pan, J. Zhang, H. Lu, Uniform yolk–shell MoS2@Carbon microsphere anodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eur. J. 23(41), 9937-9945 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201701691
[69] M.Y. Son, Y.J. Hong, J.-K. Lee, Y. Chan Kang, One-pot synthesis of Fe2O3 yolk-shell particles with two, three, and four shells for application as an anode material in lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 5(23), 11592-11597 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR03978A
[70] X. Fang, S. Liu, J. Zang, C. Xu, M.-S. Zheng, Q.-F. Dong, D. Sun, N. Zheng, Precisely controlled resorcinol-formaldehyde resin coating for fabricating core-shell, hollow, and yolk-shell carbon nanostructures. Nanoscale 5(15), 6908-6916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR01723K
[71] T. Zhu, J. Wang, G.W. Ho, Self-supported yolk–shell nanocolloids towards high capacitance and excellent cycling performance. Nano Energy 18, 273-282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.035
[72] H. Liang, J. Ni, L. Li, Bio-inspired engineering of Bi2S3-PPy yolk-shell composite for highly durable lithium and sodium storage. Nano Energy 33, 213-220 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.033
[73] Y. Ma, A. Huang, H. Zhou, S. Ji, S. Zhang, R. Li, H. Yao, X. Cao, P. Jin, Template-free formation of various V2O5 hierarchical structures as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(14), 6522-6531 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA11194G
[74] G. Li, Z. Tang, Noble metal nanoparticle@metal oxide core/yolk-shell nanostructures as catalysts: recent progress and perspective. Nanoscale 6(8), 3995-4011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR06787D
[75] N. Liu, Z. Lu, J. Zhao, M.T. McDowell, H.-W. Lee, W. Zhao, Y. Cui, A pomegranate-inspired nanoscale design for large-volume-change lithium battery anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9(3), 187-192 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.6
[76] L. Su, Y. Xu, J. Xie, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Multi-yolk–shell SnO2/Co3Sn2@C nanocubes with high initial coulombic efficiency and oxygen reutilization for lithium storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(51), 35172-35179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10450
[77] Y. Wu, J. Meng, Q. Li, C. Niu, X. Wang, W. Yang, W. Li, L. Mai, Interface-modulated fabrication of hierarchical yolk–shell Co3O4/C dodecahedrons as stable anodes for lithium and sodium storage. Nano Res. 10(7), 2364-2376 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1433-6
[78] H. Zhang, L. Zhou, O. Noonan, D.J. Martin, A.K. Whittaker, C. Yu, Tailoring the void size of iron oxide@carbon yolk–shell structure for optimized lithium storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24(27), 4337-4342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201400178
[79] R. Zhao, X. Shen, Q. Wu, X. Zhang, W. Li et al., Heterogeneous double-shelled constructed fe3o4 yolk–shell magnetite nanoboxes with superior lithium storage performances. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(29), 24662-24670 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07443
[80] L. Yu, B. Guan, W. Xiao, X.W. Lou, Formation of yolk-shelled Ni–Co mixed oxide nanoprisms with enhanced electrochemical performance for hybrid supercapacitors and lithium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5(21), 1500981 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500981
[81] Y. Su, D. Ao, H. Liu, Y. Wang, Mof-derived yolk-shell cds microcubes with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity and stability for hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(18), 8680-8689 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA00855D
[82] J. Yang, Y. Ouyang, H. Zhang, H. Xu, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Novel Fe2p/graphitized carbon yolk/shell octahedra for high-efficiency hydrogen production and lithium storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 4(25), 9923-9930 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03501A
[83] Y. Zhang, A. Pan, L. Ding, Z. Zhou, Y. Wang, S. Niu, S. Liang, G. Cao, Nitrogen-doped yolk–shell-structured CoSe/C dodecahedra for high-performance sodium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(4), 3624-3633 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13153
[84] Z. Liu, X.-Y. Yu, U. Paik, Etching-in-a-box: a novel strategy to synthesize unique yolk-shelled Fe3O4@carbon with an ultralong cycling life for lithium storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 6(6), 1502318 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502318
[85] J. He, L. Luo, Y. Chen, A. Manthiram, Yolk–shelled C@Fe3O4 nanoboxes as efficient sulfur hosts for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29(34), 1702707 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702707
[86] Z. Liu, T. Lu, T. Song, X.-Y. Yu, X.W. Lou, U. Paik, Structure-designed synthesis of FeS2@C yolk-shell nanoboxes as a high-performance anode for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 10(7), 1576-1580 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE01100H
[87] H. Zhang, X. Huang, O. Noonan, L. Zhou, C. Yu, Tailored yolk–shell Sn@C nanoboxes for high-performance lithium storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(8), 1606023 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201606023
[88] X. Yu, J. Bi, G. Yang, H. Tao, S. Yang, Synergistic effect induced high photothermal performance of Au nanorod@Cu7S4 yolk–shell nanooctahedron particles.J. Phys. Chem. C 120(43), 24533-24541 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06213
[89] Z. Cai, L. Xu, M. Yan, C. Han, L. He et al., Manganese oxide/carbon yolk–shell nanorod anodes for high capacity lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 15(1), 738-744 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl504427d[90] N. Wang, Z. Bai, Y. Qian, J. Yang, One-dimensional yolk–shell Sb@Ti–O–P nanostructures as a high-capacity and high-rate anode material for sodium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(1), 447-454 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13193
[91] M. Zhong, D. Yang, C. Xie, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhou, X.H. Bu, Yolk-shell MnO@ZnMn2O4/N-C nanorods derived from a-MnO2 /ZIF-8 as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Small 12(40), 5564-5571 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201601959
[92] A. Li, P. Zhang, X. Chang, W. Cai, T. Wang, J. Gong, Gold nanorod@TiO2 yolk-shell nanostructures for visible-light-driven photocatalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Small 11(16), 1892-1899 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201403058
[93] J. Zhang, K. Wang, Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, F. Cheng, S. Guo, Beyond yolk–shell nanoparticles: Fe3O4@Fe3C core@shell nanoparticles as yolks and carbon nanospindles as shells for efficient lithium ion storage. ACS Nano 9(3), 3369-3376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00760
[94] Y. Zhao, Z. Feng, Z.J. Xu, Yolk-shell Fe2O3⊙C composites anchored on MWNTs with enhanced lithium and sodium storage. Nanoscale 7(21), 9520-9525 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR01281C
[95] B. Li, R. Qi, J. Zai, F. Du, C. Xue, Y. Jin, C. Jin, Z. Ma, X. Qian, Silica wastes to high-performance lithium storage materials: a rational designed Al2O3 coating assisted magnesiothermic process. Small 12(38), 5281-5287 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201601914
[96] X. Zhang, R. Zhao, Q. Wu, W. Li, C. Shen, L. Ni, H. Yan, G. Diao, M. Chen, Petal-like MoS2 nanosheets space-confined in hollow mesoporous carbon spheres for enhanced lithium storage performance. ACS Nano 11(8), 8429-8436 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b04078
[97] X. Wang, J. Feng, Y. Bai, Q. Zhang, Y. Yin, Synthesis, properties, and applications of hollow micro-/nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 116(18), 10983-11060 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00731
[98] L. Zhou, Z. Zhuang, H. Zhao, M. Lin, D. Zhao, L. Mai, Intricate hollow structures: Controlled synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Adv. Mater. 29(20), 1602914 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201602914
[99] L. Yu, H.B. Wu, X.W.D. Lou, Self-templated formation of hollow structures for electrochemical energy applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 50(2), 293-301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00480
[100] Y. Ma, H. Tang, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Zhang, Z. Tang, Facile synthesis of Si-C nanocomposites with yolk-shell structure as an anode for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloy. Compd. 704, 599-606 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.083
[101] J. Xie, L. Tong, L. Su, Y. Xu, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Core-shell yolk-shell Si@C@Void@C nanohybrids as advanced lithium ion battery anodes with good electronic conductivity and corrosion resistance. J. Power Sources 342, 529-536 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.094
[102] J. Yang, Y.-X. Wang, S.-L. Chou, R. Zhang, Y. Xu et al., Yolk-shell silicon-mesoporous carbon anode with compact solid electrolyte interphase film for superior lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 18, 133-142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.016
[103] M. Ashuri, Q. He, L.L. Shaw, Silicon as a potential anode material for Li-ion batteries: where size, geometry and structure matter. Nanoscale 8(1), 74-103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR05116A
[104] N. Liu, H. Wu, M.T. McDowell, Y. Yao, C. Wang, Y. Cui, A yolk-shell design for stabilized and scalable li-ion battery alloy anodes. Nano Lett. 12(6), 3315-3321 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3014814
[105] D. Han, G. Guo, Y. Yan, T. Li, B. Wang, A. Dong, Pomegranate-like, carbon-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle superparticles for high-performance lithium storage. Energy Storage Mater. 10, 32-39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.003
[106] Y. Liu, Z. Tai, T. Zhou, V. Sencadas, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, K. Konstantinov, Z. Guo, H.K. Liu, An all-integrated anode via interlinked chemical bonding between double-shelled–yolk-structured silicon and binder for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 29(44), 1703028 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703028
[107] J. Wang, W. Li, F. Wang, Y. Xia, A.M. Asiri, D. Zhao, Controllable synthesis of SnO2@C yolk-shell nanospheres as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 6(6), 3217-3222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR06452B
[108] S.H. Choi, Y.C. Kang, Synthesis for yolk-shell-structured metal sulfide powders with excellent electrochemical performances for lithium-ion batteries. Small 10(3), 474-478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201301483
[109] H. Fan, H. Yu, Y. Zhang, J. Guo, Z. Wang et al., From zinc-cyanide hybrid coordination polymers to hierarchical yolk-shell structures for high-performance and ultra-stable lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 33, 168-176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.043
[110] H.Z. Li, L.Y. Yang, J. Liu, S.T. Li, L.B. Fang, Y.K. Lu, H.R. Yang, S.L. Liu, M. Lei, Improved electrochemical performance of yolk-shell structured SnO2@void@C porous nanowires as anode for lithium and sodium batteries. J. Power Sources 324, 780-787 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.011
[111] S. Li, Z. Wang, J. Liu, L. Yang, Y. Guo, L. Cheng, M. Lei, W. Wang, Yolk–shell Sn@C eggette-like nanostructure: application in lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(30), 19438-19445 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b04736
[112] L. Jiang, Y. Qu, Z. Ren, P. Yu, D. Zhao, W. Zhou, L. Wang, H. Fu, In Situ Carbon-coated yolk–shell V2O3 microspheres for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(3), 1595-1601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/am5070393
[113] J. Li, D. Yan, S. Hou, T. Lu, Y. Yao, D.H.C. Chua, L. Pan, Metal-organic frameworks derived yolk-shell ZnO/NiO microspheres as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 335, 579-589 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.183
[114] S. Li, J Niu, Y.C. Zhao, K.P. So, C. Wang, C.A. Wang, J. Li, High-rate aluminium yolk-shell nanoparticle anode for Li-ion battery with long cycle life and ultrahigh capacity. Nat. Commun. 6, 7872 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8872
[115] J.H. Kim, Y.C. Kang, Synthesis of uniquely structured yolk-shell metal oxide microspheres filled with nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon with excellent Li-ion storage performance. Small 13(39), 1701585 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201701585
[116] Y. Zhu, S.H. Choi, X. Fan, J. Shin, Z. Ma, M.R. Zachariah, J.W. Choi, C. Wang, Recent progress on spray pyrolysis for high performance electrode materials in lithium and sodium rechargeable batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 7(7), 1601578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601578
[117] J.H. Kim, Y.C. Kang, Yolk–shell-structured (Fe0.5Ni0.5)9S8 solid-solution powders: Synthesis and application as anode materials for Na-ion batteries. Nano Res. 10(9), 3178-3188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1535-1
[118] L.P. Wang, Y. Leconte, Z. Feng, C. Wei, Y. Zhao et al., Novel preparation of N-doped SnO2 nanoparticles via laser-assisted pyrolysis: demonstration of exceptional lithium storage properties. Adv. Mater. 29(6), 1603286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603286
[119] M.A. Mahadik, Y.M. Hunge, S.S. Shinde, K.Y. Rajpure C.H. Bhosale, Semiconducting properties of aluminum-doped ZnO thin films grown by spray pyrolysis technique. J. Semicond. 36(3), 23-28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033002
[120] S.H. Choi, J.-K. Lee, Y.C. Kang, Controllable synthesis of yolk-shell-structured metal oxides with seven to ten components for finding materials with superior lithium storage properties. Nanoscale 6(21), 12421-12425 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR03777D
[121] T. Chen, Y. Hu, B. Cheng, R. Chen, H. Lv et al., Multi-yolk-shell copper oxide@carbon octahedra as high-stability anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 20, 305-314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.024
[122] W. Qiu, J. Jiao, J. Xia, H. Zhong, L. Chen, A self-standing and flexible electrode of yolk–shell CoS2 spheres encapsulated with nitrogen-doped graphene for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eur. J. 21(11), 4359-4367 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201405821
[123] Y. Huang, D. Wu, A. Dianat, M. Bobeth, T. Huang, Y. Mai, F. Zhang, G. Cuniberti, X. Feng, Bipolar nitrogen-doped graphene frameworks as high-performance cathodes for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(4), 1588-1594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA09161J
[124] C. Wu, P. Kopold, P.A. van Aken, J. Maier, Y. Yu, High performance graphene/Ni2P hybrid anodes for lithium and sodium storage through 3D yolk–shell-like nanostructural design. Adv. Mater. 29(3), 1604015 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604015
[125] R. Mo, D. Rooney, K. Sun, H.Y. Yang, 3D nitrogen-doped graphene foam with encapsulated germanium/nitrogen-doped graphene yolk-shell nanoarchitecture for high-performance flexible Li-ion battery. Nat. Commun. 8, 13949 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13949
[126] D. Xu, R. Jiao, Y. Sun, D. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Zeng, Y. Di, l-Cysteine-assisted synthesis of urchin-like γ-MnS and its lithium storage properties. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11(1), 444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1664-6
[127] L. Feng, Y. Zhang, R. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Bai et al,, Preparation of PPy-coated MnO2 hybrid micromaterials and their improved cyclic performance as anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12(1), 518 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2286-3
[128] S.H. Choi, Y.C. Kang, Synergetic effect of yolk–shell structure and uniform mixing of SnS–MoS2 nanocrystals for improved na-ion storage capabilities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(44), 24694-24702 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b07093
[129] V. Palomares, P. Serras, I. Villaluenga, K.B. Hueso, J. Carretero-Gonzalez, T. Rojo, Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 5(3), 5884-5901 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE02781J
[130] Y. Zhang, C. Wang, H. Hou, G. Zou, X. Ji, Nitrogen doped/carbon tuning yolk-like TiO2 and its remarkable impact on sodium storage performances. Adv. Energy Mater. 7(4), 1600173 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600173
[131] S. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Ai, H. Yang, Y. Cao, Yolk–shell TiO2@C nanocomposite as high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(1), 345-353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b12001
[132] J. Liu, L. Yu, C. Wu, Y. Wen, K. Yin et al., New nanoconfined galvanic replacement synthesis of hollow Sb@C yolk–shell spheres constituting a stable anode for high-rate Li/Na-Ion batteries. Nano Lett. 17(3), 2034-2042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00083
[133] H. Geng, J. Yang, Z. Dai, Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng et al., Co9S8/MoS2 yolk–shell spheres for advanced li/na storage. Small 13(14), 1603490 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201603490
[134] L. Ma, P. Yan, S. Wu, G. Zhu, Y. Shen, Engineering tin phosphides@carbon yolk-shell nanocube structures as a highly stable anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(32), 16994-17000 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA04900E
[135] J. Wang, H. Tang, H. Wang, R. Yu, D. Wang, Multi-shelled hollow micro-/nanostructures: promising platforms for lithium-ion batteries. Mate. Chem. Frontiers 1(3), 414-430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6QM00273K
[136] B. Li, Z. Xiao, J. Zai, M. Chen, H. Wang, X. Liu, G. Li, X. Qian, A candidate strategy to achieve high initial Coulombic efficiency and long cycle life of Si anode materials: exterior carbon coating on porous Si microparticles. Mater. Today Energy 5, 299-304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2017.07.006
[137] S. Guo, X. Hu, Y. Hou, Z. Wen, Tunable synthesis of yolk–shell porous silicon@carbon for optimizing si/c-based anode of lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(48), 42084-42092 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b13035
[138] M. Delong, C. Zhanyi, H. Anming, Si-based anode materials for li-ion batteries: a mini review. Nano-Micro Lett. 6(4), 347-358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-014-0008-2
[139] Y. Zhao, X. Li, J. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Zhao, G. Yue, MOF-derived ZnO/Ni3ZnC0.7/C hybrids yolk–shell microspheres with excellent electrochemical performances for lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(10), 6472-6480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b12562

References

[1] X. Su, Q. Wu, J. Li, X. Xiao, A. Lott, W. Lu, B.W. Sheldon, J. Wu, Silicon-based nanomaterials for lithium-ion batteries: a review. Adv. Energy Mater. 4(1), 1300882 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201300882
[2] X. Meng, X.Q. Yang, Sun X, Emerging applications of atomic layer deposition for lithium-ion battery studies. Adv. Mater. 24(27), 3589-3615 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200397
[3] J.S. Chen, X.W. Lou, SnO2-based nanomaterials: synthesis and application in lithium-ion batteries. Small 9(11), 1877-1893 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201202601
[4] W.D. He, L.H. Ye, K.C. Wen, Y.C. Liang, W.Q. Lv, G.L. Zhu, K.H.L. Zhang, Materials research advances towards high-capacity battery/fuel cell devices. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 14(1), 12-20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.511031
[5] X. Tong, Ferroelectric properties and application of hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 15(4): 326-332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.7090905
[6] X. Tong, X.T. Kong, Y. Zhou, F. Navarro-Pardo, G.S. Selopal et al., Near-infrared, heavy metal-free colloidal “giant” core/shell quantum dots. Adv. Energy Mater. 8(2), 1701432 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201701432
[7] Q. Fan, Q. Lan, M. Zhang, X. Fan, Z. Zhou, C. Zhang, Preparation and photocatalytic activities of 3D flower-like CuO nanostructures. J. Semicond. 37(8), 19-27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083002
[8] B. Luo, L. Zhi, Design and construction of three dimensional graphene-based composites for lithium ion battery applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 8(2), 456-477 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE02578D
[9] Y. Tang, Y. Zhang, W. Li, B. Ma, X. Chen, Rational material design for ultrafast rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44(17), 5926-5940 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00442F
[10] Y. Sun, N. Liu, Y. Cui, Promises and challenges of nanomaterials for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16071 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.71
[11] L. Lu, X. Han, J. Li, J. Hua, M. Ouyang, A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 226, 272-288 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060
[12] K. Fu, Z. Wang, C. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Yao et al., All-component transient lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6(10), 1502496 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502496
[13] Y. Hou, M. Qiu, T. Zhang, J. Ma, S. Liu, X. Zhuang, C. Yuan, X. Feng, Efficient electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting by a 3d nanostructured carbon supported on flexible exfoliated graphene foil. Adv. Mater. 29(3), 1604480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604480
[14] S.P. Ong, V.L. Chevrier, G. Hautier, A. Jain, C. Moore, S. Kim, X. Ma, G. Ceder, Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(9), 3680-3688 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE01782A
[15] G. Li, Y. Li, J. Chen, P. Zhao, D. Li, Y. Dong, L. Zhang, Synthesis and research of egg shell-yolk NiO/C porous composites as lithium-ion battery anode material. Electrochim. Acta 245, 941-948 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.039
[16] Y. Liang, Y. Jing, S. Gheytani, K.-Y. Lee, P. Liu, A. Facchetti, Y. Yao, Universal quinone electrodes for long cycle life aqueous rechargeable batteries. Nat. Mater. 16(8), 841-848 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4919
[17] M.T. McDowell, S.W. Lee, W.D. Nix, Y. Cui, 25th Anniversary Article: Understanding the Lithiation of Silicon and Other Alloying Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 25(36), 4966-4985 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301795
[18] W. Liu, P. Oh, X. Liu, M.-J. Lee, W. Cho, S. Chae, Y. Kim, J. Cho, Nickel-rich layered lithium transition-metal oxide for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(15), 4440-4457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409262
[19] P. Roy, S.K. Srivastava, Nanostructured anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(6), 2454-2484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA04980B
[20] L. Ji, Z. Lin, M. Alcoutlabi, X. Zhang, Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(8), 2682-2699 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00699H
[21] Z. Li, H.B. Wu, X.W. Lou, Rational designs and engineering of hollow micro-/nanostructures as sulfur hosts for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 9(10), 3061-3070 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE02364A
[22] M. Zhang, E. Liu, T. Cao, H. Wang, C. Shi et al., Sandwiched graphene inserted with graphene-encapsulated yolk-shell g-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for efficient lithium ion storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(15), 7035-7042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA01239J
[23] R. Luo, W. Lv, K. Wen, W. He, Overview of graphene as anode in lithium-ion batteries. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 0, 1-12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.6032519
[24] Z. Li, J. Ding, D. Mitlin, Tin and tin compounds for sodium ion battery anodes: phase transformations and performance. Acc. Chem. Res. 48(6), 1657-1665 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00114
[25] M.-S. Balogun, Y. Luo, W. Qiu, P. Liu, Y. Tong, A review of carbon materials and their composites with alloy metals for sodium ion battery anodes. Carbon 98, 162-178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.091
[26] X. Xiang, K. Zhang, J. Chen, Recent advances and prospects of cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 27(36), 5343-5364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501527
[27] H. Kim, H. Kim, Z. Ding, M.H. Lee, K. Lim, G. Yoon, K. Kang, Recent progress in electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6(19), 1600943 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600943
[28] L.P. Wang, L. Yu, X. Wang, M. Srinivasan, Z.J. Xu, Recent developments in electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(18), 9353-9378 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06467D
[29] S.-W. Kim, D.-H. Seo, X. Ma, G. Ceder, K. Kang, Electrode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries: potential alternatives to current lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2(7), 710-721 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201200026
[30] X. Zuo, J. Zhu, P. Müller-Buschbaum, Y.-J. Cheng, Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: A chronicle perspective review. Nano Energy 31, 113-143 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.013
[31] Y. Zhao, L.P. Wang, M.T. Sougrati, Z. Feng, Y. Leconte, A. Fisher, M. Srinivasan, Z. Xu, A review on design strategies for carbon based metal oxides and sulfides nanocomposites for high performance Li and Na ion battery anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 7(9), 1601424 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601424
[32] L. Shen, L. Yu, X.-Y. Yu, X. Zhang, X.W. Lou, Self-templated formation of uniform NiCo2O4 hollow spheres with complex interior structures for lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(6), 1868-1872 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409776
[33] J. Xie, L. Liu, J. Xia, Y. Zhang, M. Li, Y. Ouyang, S. Nie, X. Wang, Template-free synthesis of Sb2S3 hollow microspheres as anode materials for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 10(1), 12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-017-0165-1
[34] X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, B. Luo, H. Zhu, W. Chu, K. Huang, Microwave-assisted synthesis of NiCo2O4 double-shelled hollow spheres for high-performance sodium ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 10(1), 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-017-0164-2
[35] H. Chen, B. Qi, T. Moore, F. Wang, D.C. Colvin et al., Multifunctional yolk-in-shell nanoparticles for ph-triggered drug release and imaging. Small 10(16), 3364-3370 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201303769
[36] X. Li, X. Zhou, H. Guo, C. Wang, J. Liu, P. Sun, F. Liu, G. Lu, Design of Au@ZnO yolk–shell nanospheres with enhanced gas sensing properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(21), 18661-18667 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am5057322
[37] Z.-M. Cui, Z. Chen, C.-Y. Cao, L. Jiang, W.-G. Song, A yolk-shell structured Fe2O3@mesoporous SiO2 nanoreactor for enhanced activity as a Fenton catalyst in total oxidation of dyes. Chem. Commun. 49(23), 2332-2334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC38649J
[38] Y.N. Ko, Y.C. Kang, S.B. Park, A new strategy for synthesizing yolk-shell V2O5 powders with low melting temperature for high performance Li-ion batteries. Nanoscale 5(19), 8899-8903 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR02625F
[39] Y.N. Ko, S.H. Choi, S.B. Park, Y.C. Kang, Hierarchical MoSe2 yolk-shell microspheres with superior Na-ion storage properties. Nanoscale 6(18), 10511-10515 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR02538E
[40] P. Hou, H. Zhang, Z. Zi, L. Zhang, X. Xu, Core-shell and concentration-gradient cathodes prepared via co-precipitation reaction for advanced lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(9), 4254-4279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA10297B
[41] S.H. Choi, Y.C. Kang, Ultrafast synthesis of yolk-shell and cubic NiO nanopowders and application in lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(4), 2312-2316 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am404232x
[42] Z. Li, M. Li, Z. Bian, Y. Kathiraser, S. Kawi, Design of highly stable and selective core/yolk–shell nanocatalysts—A review. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 188, 324-341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.067
[43] L. Yu, H. Hu, H.B. Wu, X.W. Lou, Complex hollow nanostructures: Synthesis and energy-related applications. Adv. Mater. 29(15), 1604563 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604563
[44] F. Xie, L. Zhang, D. Su, M. Jaroniec, S.-Z. Qiao, Na2Ti3O7@N-doped carbon hollow spheres for sodium-ion batteries with excellent rate performance. Adv. Mater. 29(24), 1700989 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700989
[45] M. Kim, K. Sohn, H.B. Na, T. Hyeon, Synthesis of nanorattles composed of gold nanoparticles encapsulated in mesoporous carbon and polymer shells. Nano Lett. 2(12), 1383-1387 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl025820j
[46] J. Gao, G. Liang, B. Zhang, Y. Kuang, X. Zhang, B. Xu, FePt@CoS2 yolk−shell nanocrystals as a potent agent to kill hela cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(5), 1428-1433 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja067785e
[47] J.S. Chen, C.M. Li, W.W. Zhou, Q.Y. Yan, L.A. Archer, X.W. Lou, One-pot formation of SnO2 hollow nanospheres and α-Fe2O3@SnO2 nanorattles with large void space and their lithium storage properties. Nanoscale 1(2), 280-285 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/B9NR00102F
[48] Y. Chen, H. Chen, L. Guo, Q. He, F. Chen, J. Zhou, J. Feng, J. Shi, Hollow/rattle-type mesoporous nanostructures by a structural difference-based selective etching strategy. ACS Nano 4(1), 529-539 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901398j
[49] W. Wei, Y. Zhao, S. Peng, H. Zhang, Y. Bian, H. Li, H. Li, Yolk–shell nanoarchitectures with a Ru-containing core and a radially oriented mesoporous silica shell: facile synthesis and application for one-pot biomass conversion by combining with enzyme. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(23), 20851-20859 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am5052608
[50] X.-J. Wu, D. Xu, Soft template synthesis of yolk/silica shell particles. Adv. Mater. 22(13), 1516-1520 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200903879
[51] H. Wang, H. Lin, Y. Long, B. Ni, T. He, S. Zhang, H. Zhu, X. Wang, Titanocene dichloride (Cp2TiCl2) as a precursor for template-free fabrication of hollow TiO2 nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nanoscale 9(5), 2074-2081 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR09730H
[52] C.C. Yec, H.C. Zeng, Synthesis of complex nanomaterials via Ostwald ripening. J. Mater. Chem. A 2(14), 4843-4851 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA14203E
[53] B. Zhao, X. Guo, W. Zhao, J. Deng, B. Fan, G. Shao, Z. Bai, R. Zhang, Facile synthesis of yolk–shell Ni@void@SnO2(Ni3Sn2) ternary composites via galvanic replacement/Kirkendall effect and their enhanced microwave absorption properties. Nano Res. 10(1), 331-343 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1295-3
[54] R. Purbia, S. Paria, Yolk/shell nanoparticles: classifications, synthesis, properties, and applications. Nanoscale 7(47), 19789-19873 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR04729C
[55] J. Liu, S.Z. Qiao, J.S. Chen, X.W. Lou, X. Xing, G.Q. Lu, Yolk/shell nanoparticles: new platforms for nanoreactors, drug delivery and lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 47(47), 12578-12591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC13658E
[56] Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, L. Ding, Y. Wang, J. Xu, One-pot method for multifunctional yolk structured nanocomposites with N-doped carbon shell using polydopamine as precursor. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11(1), 212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1425-6
[57] J. Li, J. Wang, D. Wexler, D. Shi, J. Liang, H. Liu, S. Xiong, Y. Qian, Simple synthesis of yolk-shelled ZnCo2O4 microspheres towards enhancing the electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries in conjunction with a sodium carboxymethyl cellulose binder. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(48), 15292-15299 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA13787B
[58] Y.J. Hong, M.Y. Son, Y.C. Kang, One-pot facile synthesis of double-shelled sno2 yolk-shell-structured powders by continuous process as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 25(16), 2279-2283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201204506
[59] J. Li, J. Wang, X. Liang, Z. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Qian, S. Xiong, Hollow MnCo2O4 submicrospheres with multilevel interiors: from mesoporous spheres to yolk-in-double-shell structures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(1), 24-30 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am404841t
[60] J. Leng, Z. Wang, X. Li, H. Guo, H. Li, K. Shih, G. Yan, J. Wang, Accurate construction of a hierarchical nickel-cobalt oxide multishell yolk-shell structure with large and ultrafast lithium storage capability. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(29), 14996-15001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA02956J
[61] M.Y. Son, Y.J. Hong, Y.C. Kang, Superior electrochemical properties of Co3O4 yolk-shell powders with a filled core and multishells prepared by a one-pot spray pyrolysis. Chem. Commun. 49(50), 5678-5680 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC42117A
[62] J. Liu, P. Kopold, C. Wu, P.A. van Aken, J. Maier, Y. Yu, Uniform yolk-shell Sn4P3@C nanospheres as high-capacity and cycle-stable anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 8(12), 3531-3538 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE02074C
[63] A. Guiet, C. Göbel, K. Klingan, M. Lublow, T. Reier et al., Hydrophobic nanoreactor soft-templating: a supramolecular approach to yolk@shell materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(39), 6228-6240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201502388
[64] J.S. Cho, Y.C. Kang, Nanofibers comprising yolk–shell Sn@void@SnO/SnO2 and hollow SnO/SnO2 and SnO2 nanospheres via the kirkendall diffusion effect and their electrochemical properties. Small 11(36), 4673-4681 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201500940
[65] L. Cao, D. Chen, R.A. Caruso, Surface-metastable phase-initiated seeding and ostwald ripening: A facile fluorine-free process towards spherical fluffy core/shell, yolk/shell, and hollow anatase nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(42), 10986-10991 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201305819
[66] C. Dai, A. Zhang, J. Li, K. Hou, M. Liu, C. Song, X. Guo, Synthesis of yolk-shell HPW@Hollow silicalite-1 for esterification reaction. Chem. Commun. 50(37), 4846-4848 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC00693C
[67] B.Y. Guan, A. Kushima, L. Yu, S. Li, J. Li, X.W. Lou, Coordination polymers derived general synthesis of multishelled mixed metal-oxide particles for hybrid supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 29(17), 1605902 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605902
[68] Y. Pan, J. Zhang, H. Lu, Uniform yolk–shell MoS2@Carbon microsphere anodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eur. J. 23(41), 9937-9945 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201701691
[69] M.Y. Son, Y.J. Hong, J.-K. Lee, Y. Chan Kang, One-pot synthesis of Fe2O3 yolk-shell particles with two, three, and four shells for application as an anode material in lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 5(23), 11592-11597 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR03978A
[70] X. Fang, S. Liu, J. Zang, C. Xu, M.-S. Zheng, Q.-F. Dong, D. Sun, N. Zheng, Precisely controlled resorcinol-formaldehyde resin coating for fabricating core-shell, hollow, and yolk-shell carbon nanostructures. Nanoscale 5(15), 6908-6916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR01723K
[71] T. Zhu, J. Wang, G.W. Ho, Self-supported yolk–shell nanocolloids towards high capacitance and excellent cycling performance. Nano Energy 18, 273-282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.035
[72] H. Liang, J. Ni, L. Li, Bio-inspired engineering of Bi2S3-PPy yolk-shell composite for highly durable lithium and sodium storage. Nano Energy 33, 213-220 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.033
[73] Y. Ma, A. Huang, H. Zhou, S. Ji, S. Zhang, R. Li, H. Yao, X. Cao, P. Jin, Template-free formation of various V2O5 hierarchical structures as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(14), 6522-6531 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA11194G
[74] G. Li, Z. Tang, Noble metal nanoparticle@metal oxide core/yolk-shell nanostructures as catalysts: recent progress and perspective. Nanoscale 6(8), 3995-4011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR06787D
[75] N. Liu, Z. Lu, J. Zhao, M.T. McDowell, H.-W. Lee, W. Zhao, Y. Cui, A pomegranate-inspired nanoscale design for large-volume-change lithium battery anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9(3), 187-192 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.6
[76] L. Su, Y. Xu, J. Xie, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Multi-yolk–shell SnO2/Co3Sn2@C nanocubes with high initial coulombic efficiency and oxygen reutilization for lithium storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(51), 35172-35179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10450
[77] Y. Wu, J. Meng, Q. Li, C. Niu, X. Wang, W. Yang, W. Li, L. Mai, Interface-modulated fabrication of hierarchical yolk–shell Co3O4/C dodecahedrons as stable anodes for lithium and sodium storage. Nano Res. 10(7), 2364-2376 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1433-6
[78] H. Zhang, L. Zhou, O. Noonan, D.J. Martin, A.K. Whittaker, C. Yu, Tailoring the void size of iron oxide@carbon yolk–shell structure for optimized lithium storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24(27), 4337-4342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201400178
[79] R. Zhao, X. Shen, Q. Wu, X. Zhang, W. Li et al., Heterogeneous double-shelled constructed fe3o4 yolk–shell magnetite nanoboxes with superior lithium storage performances. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(29), 24662-24670 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07443
[80] L. Yu, B. Guan, W. Xiao, X.W. Lou, Formation of yolk-shelled Ni–Co mixed oxide nanoprisms with enhanced electrochemical performance for hybrid supercapacitors and lithium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5(21), 1500981 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500981
[81] Y. Su, D. Ao, H. Liu, Y. Wang, Mof-derived yolk-shell cds microcubes with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity and stability for hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(18), 8680-8689 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA00855D
[82] J. Yang, Y. Ouyang, H. Zhang, H. Xu, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Novel Fe2p/graphitized carbon yolk/shell octahedra for high-efficiency hydrogen production and lithium storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 4(25), 9923-9930 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03501A
[83] Y. Zhang, A. Pan, L. Ding, Z. Zhou, Y. Wang, S. Niu, S. Liang, G. Cao, Nitrogen-doped yolk–shell-structured CoSe/C dodecahedra for high-performance sodium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(4), 3624-3633 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13153
[84] Z. Liu, X.-Y. Yu, U. Paik, Etching-in-a-box: a novel strategy to synthesize unique yolk-shelled Fe3O4@carbon with an ultralong cycling life for lithium storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 6(6), 1502318 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502318
[85] J. He, L. Luo, Y. Chen, A. Manthiram, Yolk–shelled C@Fe3O4 nanoboxes as efficient sulfur hosts for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 29(34), 1702707 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702707
[86] Z. Liu, T. Lu, T. Song, X.-Y. Yu, X.W. Lou, U. Paik, Structure-designed synthesis of FeS2@C yolk-shell nanoboxes as a high-performance anode for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 10(7), 1576-1580 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE01100H
[87] H. Zhang, X. Huang, O. Noonan, L. Zhou, C. Yu, Tailored yolk–shell Sn@C nanoboxes for high-performance lithium storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(8), 1606023 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201606023
[88] X. Yu, J. Bi, G. Yang, H. Tao, S. Yang, Synergistic effect induced high photothermal performance of Au nanorod@Cu7S4 yolk–shell nanooctahedron particles. J. Phys. Chem. C 120(43), 24533-24541 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06213
[89] Z. Cai, L. Xu, M. Yan, C. Han, L. He et al., Manganese oxide/carbon yolk–shell nanorod anodes for high capacity lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 15(1), 738-744 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl504427d
[90] N. Wang, Z. Bai, Y. Qian, J. Yang, One-dimensional yolk–shell Sb@Ti–O–P nanostructures as a high-capacity and high-rate anode material for sodium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(1), 447-454 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13193
[91] M. Zhong, D. Yang, C. Xie, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhou, X.H. Bu, Yolk-shell MnO@ZnMn2O4/N-C nanorods derived from a-MnO2 /ZIF-8 as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Small 12(40), 5564-5571 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201601959
[92] A. Li, P. Zhang, X. Chang, W. Cai, T. Wang, J. Gong, Gold nanorod@TiO2 yolk-shell nanostructures for visible-light-driven photocatalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Small 11(16), 1892-1899 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201403058
[93] J. Zhang, K. Wang, Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, F. Cheng, S. Guo, Beyond yolk–shell nanoparticles: Fe3O4@Fe3C core@shell nanoparticles as yolks and carbon nanospindles as shells for efficient lithium ion storage. ACS Nano 9(3), 3369-3376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00760
[94] Y. Zhao, Z. Feng, Z.J. Xu, Yolk-shell Fe2O3⊙C composites anchored on MWNTs with enhanced lithium and sodium storage. Nanoscale 7(21), 9520-9525 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR01281C
[95] B. Li, R. Qi, J. Zai, F. Du, C. Xue, Y. Jin, C. Jin, Z. Ma, X. Qian, Silica wastes to high-performance lithium storage materials: a rational designed Al2O3 coating assisted magnesiothermic process. Small 12(38), 5281-5287 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201601914
[96] X. Zhang, R. Zhao, Q. Wu, W. Li, C. Shen, L. Ni, H. Yan, G. Diao, M. Chen, Petal-like MoS2 nanosheets space-confined in hollow mesoporous carbon spheres for enhanced lithium storage performance. ACS Nano 11(8), 8429-8436 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b04078
[97] X. Wang, J. Feng, Y. Bai, Q. Zhang, Y. Yin, Synthesis, properties, and applications of hollow micro-/nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 116(18), 10983-11060 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00731
[98] L. Zhou, Z. Zhuang, H. Zhao, M. Lin, D. Zhao, L. Mai, Intricate hollow structures: Controlled synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Adv. Mater. 29(20), 1602914 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201602914
[99] L. Yu, H.B. Wu, X.W.D. Lou, Self-templated formation of hollow structures for electrochemical energy applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 50(2), 293-301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00480
[100] Y. Ma, H. Tang, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Zhang, Z. Tang, Facile synthesis of Si-C nanocomposites with yolk-shell structure as an anode for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloy. Compd. 704, 599-606 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.083
[101] J. Xie, L. Tong, L. Su, Y. Xu, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Core-shell yolk-shell Si@C@Void@C nanohybrids as advanced lithium ion battery anodes with good electronic conductivity and corrosion resistance. J. Power Sources 342, 529-536 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.094
[102] J. Yang, Y.-X. Wang, S.-L. Chou, R. Zhang, Y. Xu et al., Yolk-shell silicon-mesoporous carbon anode with compact solid electrolyte interphase film for superior lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 18, 133-142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.016
[103] M. Ashuri, Q. He, L.L. Shaw, Silicon as a potential anode material for Li-ion batteries: where size, geometry and structure matter. Nanoscale 8(1), 74-103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR05116A
[104] N. Liu, H. Wu, M.T. McDowell, Y. Yao, C. Wang, Y. Cui, A yolk-shell design for stabilized and scalable li-ion battery alloy anodes. Nano Lett. 12(6), 3315-3321 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3014814
[105] D. Han, G. Guo, Y. Yan, T. Li, B. Wang, A. Dong, Pomegranate-like, carbon-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle superparticles for high-performance lithium storage. Energy Storage Mater. 10, 32-39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.003
[106] Y. Liu, Z. Tai, T. Zhou, V. Sencadas, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, K. Konstantinov, Z. Guo, H.K. Liu, An all-integrated anode via interlinked chemical bonding between double-shelled–yolk-structured silicon and binder for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 29(44), 1703028 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703028
[107] J. Wang, W. Li, F. Wang, Y. Xia, A.M. Asiri, D. Zhao, Controllable synthesis of SnO2@C yolk-shell nanospheres as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 6(6), 3217-3222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR06452B
[108] S.H. Choi, Y.C. Kang, Synthesis for yolk-shell-structured metal sulfide powders with excellent electrochemical performances for lithium-ion batteries. Small 10(3), 474-478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201301483
[109] H. Fan, H. Yu, Y. Zhang, J. Guo, Z. Wang et al., From zinc-cyanide hybrid coordination polymers to hierarchical yolk-shell structures for high-performance and ultra-stable lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 33, 168-176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.043
[110] H.Z. Li, L.Y. Yang, J. Liu, S.T. Li, L.B. Fang, Y.K. Lu, H.R. Yang, S.L. Liu, M. Lei, Improved electrochemical performance of yolk-shell structured SnO2@void@C porous nanowires as anode for lithium and sodium batteries. J. Power Sources 324, 780-787 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.011
[111] S. Li, Z. Wang, J. Liu, L. Yang, Y. Guo, L. Cheng, M. Lei, W. Wang, Yolk–shell Sn@C eggette-like nanostructure: application in lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(30), 19438-19445 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b04736
[112] L. Jiang, Y. Qu, Z. Ren, P. Yu, D. Zhao, W. Zhou, L. Wang, H. Fu, In Situ Carbon-coated yolk–shell V2O3 microspheres for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(3), 1595-1601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/am5070393
[113] J. Li, D. Yan, S. Hou, T. Lu, Y. Yao, D.H.C. Chua, L. Pan, Metal-organic frameworks derived yolk-shell ZnO/NiO microspheres as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 335, 579-589 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.183
[114] S. Li, J Niu, Y.C. Zhao, K.P. So, C. Wang, C.A. Wang, J. Li, High-rate aluminium yolk-shell nanoparticle anode for Li-ion battery with long cycle life and ultrahigh capacity. Nat. Commun. 6, 7872 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8872
[115] J.H. Kim, Y.C. Kang, Synthesis of uniquely structured yolk-shell metal oxide microspheres filled with nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon with excellent Li-ion storage performance. Small 13(39), 1701585 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201701585
[116] Y. Zhu, S.H. Choi, X. Fan, J. Shin, Z. Ma, M.R. Zachariah, J.W. Choi, C. Wang, Recent progress on spray pyrolysis for high performance electrode materials in lithium and sodium rechargeable batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 7(7), 1601578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601578
[117] J.H. Kim, Y.C. Kang, Yolk–shell-structured (Fe0.5Ni0.5)9S8 solid-solution powders: Synthesis and application as anode materials for Na-ion batteries. Nano Res. 10(9), 3178-3188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1535-1
[118] L.P. Wang, Y. Leconte, Z. Feng, C. Wei, Y. Zhao et al., Novel preparation of N-doped SnO2 nanoparticles via laser-assisted pyrolysis: demonstration of exceptional lithium storage properties. Adv. Mater. 29(6), 1603286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603286
[119] M.A. Mahadik, Y.M. Hunge, S.S. Shinde, K.Y. Rajpure C.H. Bhosale, Semiconducting properties of aluminum-doped ZnO thin films grown by spray pyrolysis technique. J. Semicond. 36(3), 23-28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033002
[120] S.H. Choi, J.-K. Lee, Y.C. Kang, Controllable synthesis of yolk-shell-structured metal oxides with seven to ten components for finding materials with superior lithium storage properties. Nanoscale 6(21), 12421-12425 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR03777D
[121] T. Chen, Y. Hu, B. Cheng, R. Chen, H. Lv et al., Multi-yolk-shell copper oxide@carbon octahedra as high-stability anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 20, 305-314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.024
[122] W. Qiu, J. Jiao, J. Xia, H. Zhong, L. Chen, A self-standing and flexible electrode of yolk–shell CoS2 spheres encapsulated with nitrogen-doped graphene for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eur. J. 21(11), 4359-4367 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201405821
[123] Y. Huang, D. Wu, A. Dianat, M. Bobeth, T. Huang, Y. Mai, F. Zhang, G. Cuniberti, X. Feng, Bipolar nitrogen-doped graphene frameworks as high-performance cathodes for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(4), 1588-1594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA09161J
[124] C. Wu, P. Kopold, P.A. van Aken, J. Maier, Y. Yu, High performance graphene/Ni2P hybrid anodes for lithium and sodium storage through 3D yolk–shell-like nanostructural design. Adv. Mater. 29(3), 1604015 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604015
[125] R. Mo, D. Rooney, K. Sun, H.Y. Yang, 3D nitrogen-doped graphene foam with encapsulated germanium/nitrogen-doped graphene yolk-shell nanoarchitecture for high-performance flexible Li-ion battery. Nat. Commun. 8, 13949 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13949
[126] D. Xu, R. Jiao, Y. Sun, D. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Zeng, Y. Di, l-Cysteine-assisted synthesis of urchin-like γ-MnS and its lithium storage properties. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11(1), 444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1664-6
[127] L. Feng, Y. Zhang, R. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Bai et al,, Preparation of PPy-coated MnO2 hybrid micromaterials and their improved cyclic performance as anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12(1), 518 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2286-3
[128] S.H. Choi, Y.C. Kang, Synergetic effect of yolk–shell structure and uniform mixing of SnS–MoS2 nanocrystals for improved na-ion storage capabilities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(44), 24694-24702 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b07093
[129] V. Palomares, P. Serras, I. Villaluenga, K.B. Hueso, J. Carretero-Gonzalez, T. Rojo, Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 5(3), 5884-5901 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE02781J
[130] Y. Zhang, C. Wang, H. Hou, G. Zou, X. Ji, Nitrogen doped/carbon tuning yolk-like TiO2 and its remarkable impact on sodium storage performances. Adv. Energy Mater. 7(4), 1600173 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600173
[131] S. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Ai, H. Yang, Y. Cao, Yolk–shell TiO2@C nanocomposite as high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(1), 345-353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b12001
[132] J. Liu, L. Yu, C. Wu, Y. Wen, K. Yin et al., New nanoconfined galvanic replacement synthesis of hollow Sb@C yolk–shell spheres constituting a stable anode for high-rate Li/Na-Ion batteries. Nano Lett. 17(3), 2034-2042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00083
[133] H. Geng, J. Yang, Z. Dai, Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng et al., Co9S8/MoS2 yolk–shell spheres for advanced li/na storage. Small 13(14), 1603490 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201603490
[134] L. Ma, P. Yan, S. Wu, G. Zhu, Y. Shen, Engineering tin phosphides@carbon yolk-shell nanocube structures as a highly stable anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(32), 16994-17000 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA04900E
[135] J. Wang, H. Tang, H. Wang, R. Yu, D. Wang, Multi-shelled hollow micro-/nanostructures: promising platforms for lithium-ion batteries. Mate. Chem. Frontiers 1(3), 414-430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6QM00273K
[136] B. Li, Z. Xiao, J. Zai, M. Chen, H. Wang, X. Liu, G. Li, X. Qian, A candidate strategy to achieve high initial Coulombic efficiency and long cycle life of Si anode materials: exterior carbon coating on porous Si microparticles. Mater. Today Energy 5, 299-304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2017.07.006
[137] S. Guo, X. Hu, Y. Hou, Z. Wen, Tunable synthesis of yolk–shell porous silicon@carbon for optimizing si/c-based anode of lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(48), 42084-42092 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b13035
[138] M. Delong, C. Zhanyi, H. Anming, Si-based anode materials for li-ion batteries: a mini review. Nano-Micro Lett. 6(4), 347-358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-014-0008-2
[139] Y. Zhao, X. Li, J. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Zhao, G. Yue, MOF-derived ZnO/Ni3ZnC0.7/C hybrids yolk–shell microspheres with excellent electrochemical performances for lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(10), 6472-6480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b12562

Citation Information

Cuo Wu, Xin Tong, Yuanfei Ai, De-Sheng Liu, Peng Yu, Jiang Wu, Zhiming M. Wang, A Review: Enhanced Anodes of Li/Na-Ion Batteries Based on Yolk-Shell Structured Nanomaterials. Nano-Micro Lett.(2018) 10: 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0194-4

History

Received: 24 November 2017 / Accepted: 17 January 2018


Additional Info

  • Type of Publishing: JOUR - Journal
  • Title: A Review: Enhanced Anodes of Li/Na-Ion Batteries Based on Yolk-Shell Structured Nanomaterials
  • Author: Cuo Wu, Xin Tong, Yuanfei Ai, De-Sheng Liu, Peng Yu, Jiang Wu, Zhiming M. Wang
  • Year: 2018
  • Volume: 10
  • Issue: 3
  • Journal Name: Nano-Micro Letters
  • ISSN: 2150-5551
  • URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0194-4
  • Abstract: Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and sodium ion batteries (SIBs) have received much attention in energy storage system. In particular, among the great efforts on enhancing the performance of LIBs and SIBs, yolk-shell (YS) structured materials have emerged as a promising strategy towards improving lithium and sodium storage. YS structures possess unique interior void space, large surface area and short diffusion distance, which can solve the problems of volume expansion and aggregation of anode materials, thus enhancing the performance of LIBs and SIBs. In this review, we present a brief overview of recent advances in the novel YS structures of spheres, polyhedrons and rods with controllable morphology and compositions. Enhanced electrochemical performance of LIBs and SIBs based on these novel YS structured-anode materials were discussed in detail.
  • Publish Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2018
  • Start Page: 40
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40820-018-0194-4